Start. Prepare glyph data. Create metadata file. Create script file. Create source file. Copyright (c) 2000-2011 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML. Library based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011. 0u0021 0u0022 0u0023 0u0024 0u0025 0u0026 0u0027 0u0028 0u0029 0u002A 0u002B 0u002C 0u002D 0u002E 0u002F 0u0030 0u0031 0u0032 0u0033 0u0034 0u0035 0u0036 0u0037 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0038 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0039 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u003F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0040 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0041 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0044 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0045 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0046 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0048 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0049 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u004F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0050 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0051 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0053 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0054 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0055 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0056 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0057 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0058 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0059 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u005F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0060 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0061 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0062 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0063 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0064 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0065 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0066 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0067 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0068 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0069 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u006F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0070 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0071 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0072 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0073 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0074 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0075 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0077 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0078 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0079 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u007E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A0 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u00FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0152 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0153 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0160 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0161 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u017E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u02DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10140 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10141 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10142 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10143 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10144 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10145 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10146 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10147 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10148 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10149 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1014F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10150 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10151 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10152 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10153 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10154 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10156 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10157 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10158 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10159 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1015F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10160 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10161 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10163 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10164 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10166 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10169 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1016F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10172 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10173 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10176 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1017F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10180 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10181 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10182 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10183 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10184 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10185 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10186 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10187 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10188 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10189 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1018A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1018B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1018C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1018D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1018E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10190 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10191 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10193 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10194 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10195 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10196 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10197 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10198 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10199 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1019A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1019B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u101A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10280 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10281 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10282 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10283 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10284 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10285 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10286 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10287 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10288 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10289 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1028F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10290 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10291 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10292 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10293 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10294 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10295 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10296 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10297 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10298 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10299 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1029A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1029B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1029C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u102D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10300 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10302 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10303 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10304 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10305 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10306 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10307 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10309 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1030F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10310 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10311 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10312 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10313 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10314 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10315 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10316 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10317 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10318 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10319 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1031F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10320 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10321 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10322 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10323 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1032D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1032E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1032F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10330 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10331 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10332 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10333 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10334 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10335 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10336 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10337 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10338 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1033F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10340 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10341 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10342 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10343 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10344 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10345 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10346 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10347 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10348 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10349 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1034A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10350 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10351 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10352 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10353 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10354 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10355 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10356 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10357 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10358 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10359 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1035F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10360 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10361 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10362 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10363 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10364 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10365 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10366 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10367 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10368 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10369 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1036F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10370 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10371 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10372 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10373 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10374 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10375 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10376 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10377 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10378 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10379 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1037A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u108FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10920 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10921 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10922 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10923 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10924 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10925 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10926 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10927 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10928 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10929 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1092F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10930 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10931 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10932 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10933 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10935 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10936 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10937 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10938 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10939 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1093F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A61 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A62 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A63 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A64 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A65 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A66 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A67 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A68 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A69 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A6F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A74 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A75 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A76 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A77 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A78 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A79 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10A7F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C80 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C81 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C82 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C83 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C84 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C85 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C86 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C87 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C88 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C89 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C8F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C90 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C91 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C92 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C93 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C94 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C95 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C96 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C97 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C98 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C99 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10C9F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CA9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CAF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CB0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CB1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CB2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u10CFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11A46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ACF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11ADF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u11AF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D300 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D301 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D302 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D303 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D304 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D305 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D306 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D307 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D308 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D309 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D30F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D310 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D311 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D312 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D313 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D314 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D315 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D316 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D317 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D318 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D319 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D31F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D320 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D321 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D322 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D323 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D324 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D325 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D326 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D327 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D328 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D329 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D32F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D330 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D331 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D332 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D333 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D334 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D335 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D336 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D337 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D338 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D339 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D33F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D340 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D341 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D342 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D343 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D344 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D345 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D346 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D347 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D348 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D349 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D34F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D350 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D351 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D352 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D353 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D354 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D355 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1D356 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2013 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2022 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2030 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2039 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u203A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u20AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2122 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2160 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2161 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2162 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2163 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2164 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2165 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2166 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2167 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2168 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2169 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u216F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2170 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2171 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2172 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2173 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2174 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2175 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2176 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2177 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2178 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2179 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u217F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2180 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2181 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2182 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2183 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2184 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2185 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2186 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2187 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2188 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2630 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2631 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2632 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2633 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2634 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2635 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2636 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2637 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u268F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DC9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DCF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DD9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DDF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DE9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DEA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DEB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DEC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DEE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DEF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DF9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4DFF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uE000 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. Generate .ttf file. Convert .ttf to XML file. Add xAvgCharWidth data into XML file. Convert XML file to .ttf file. Padding to a 4-byte boundary. Done.